4.4 Article

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide treatment in Takayasu arteritis: Case series from the East China cohort

Journal

SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages 59-65

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.06.009

Keywords

Takayasu arteritis; Leflunomide; Treatment; Cohort

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81771730]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide (LEF) as induction treatment in a series of Takayasu arteritis (TA) patients based on a Chinese cohort. Method: Fifty-six patients from the East China TA cohort treated with LEF for at least 3 months were enrolled in this study, including the naive LEF treatment patients (n = 41) and the cyclophosphamide (CYC)-resistant LEF treatment patients (n = 15). Data in clinical features, NIH score and angiography were collected. Response to treatment was assessed by rates of complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) and response rate (RR) after 6 and 12 months of treatment. Results: The total CR rate and RR were 67.86% and 83.93% after 6 months, and 55.36% and 69.64% after 12 months, respectively. ESR and CRP levels and NIH scores decreased significantly after 12 months of LEF treatment (P < 0.05). Patients of CYC-resistant switched to LEF and reached the CR of 60.00% (9/15) and RR of 86.67% (13/15) after 6 months, and 73.33% (11/15) and 80.00% (12/15) after 12 months, respectively, with decrease in NIH scores (all P < 0.05). After following up for 14.44 +/- 6.86 months, 48 patients (85.71%) continued LEF treatment with good tolerance. One patient died from progression of TA after 2 months, 2 patients relapsed, and 3 patients with side effects were switched to other immunosuppressive agents. Conclusions: LEF led to a quick induction and sustained remission of TA, especially in refractory cases, and therefore, should be considered as an alternative treatment for TA. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available