4.7 Article

Synthetic phenolic antioxidants and transformation products in dust from different indoor environments in Toronto, Canada

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 672, Issue -, Pages 23-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.495

Keywords

SPAs; Transformation products; Home and office dust; Human exposure

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synthetic phenolic antioxidants (SPAs) are a class of anthropogenic antioxidants that are widely used in a large variety of commercial products. Although several SPAS have been listed as targets for risk assessment by Environment and Climate Change Canada, little data are available on the occurrence of SPAs in the Canadian environment. In this study, eighty-three indoor dust samples were collected from offices and homes in Toronto. Eight SPAs were detected at concentrations ranging from 67.2 to 1.55e4 ng/g, with a geometric mean (GM) concentration of 1.49e3 ng/g, among which 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) was the primary congener and had a GM concentration of 658 ng/g. Four BHT transformation products (TPs) were also detected in the indoor dust samples, with concentrations ranging from 40.4 to 1.27e4 ng/g and a GM concentration of 883 ng/g. No significant concentration difference was observed between the office and home dust samples for either the summed target SPA or TP concentrations (p > 0.05). The calculated estimated daily intakes of these chemical contaminants (0.004-10.0 ng/kg BW/day) suggest that they pose no immediate health risk to the Canadian population. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the occurrence of these chemical contaminants and their transformation products in Canadian indoor environments, and furthermore the first detection of 4-tert-butyl-phenol in an environmental sample. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available