4.7 Article

Chloropicrin alternated with biofumigation increases crop yield and modifies soil bacterial and fungal communities in strawberry production

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 675, Issue -, Pages 615-622

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.222

Keywords

Biofumigation; Chloropicrin alternated with biofumigation; Soil bacterial communities; Soil fungal communities; Strawberry yield; Soil physico-chemical properties

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0201600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation project of China [31672066]
  3. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chloropicrin (Pic) and biofumigation are both considered effective chemical and non-chemical alternatives to methyl bromide, respectively, for controlling crop-limiting soil-borne pests and diseases. In this study, we evaluated the effects of Pic alone and 'chloropicrin alternated with biofumigation' (CAB) on the soil's physicochemical properties and strawberry yield, as well as their effects on soil bacterial and fungal communities. The contents of NO3--N, available phosphorus and potassium, and electrical conductivity were all significantly increased when CAB was used. In addition, CAB also significantly increased the strawberry marketable yield. High-throughput gene sequencing showed the species abundance of some soil bacteria and fungi was significantly increased such as the phyla Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Ascomycota when CAB was used. However, CAB decreased the relative abundance of the phyla Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadete and Zygomycota. These results indicated that CAB could improve the physico-chemical properties of soil for strawberry production, increase the genetic diversity of microbes in the soil and enhance marketable fruit yield. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available