4.7 Review

AIEgens in cell-based multiplex fluorescence imaging

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-CHEMISTRY
Volume 62, Issue 10, Pages 1312-1332

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-019-9508-6

Keywords

aggregation induced emission; cell imaging; multiplex

Funding

  1. Australia-China Science and Research Fund Joint Research Centre on Personal Health Technologies, Science and Technology Bureau of Sichuan Province (China) [19YYJC1760]
  2. Sichuan Provincial Academician (Expert) Workstation (China) [2018YSGZZ03]
  3. Sichuan University of Science and Engineering (China) [2017RCL72]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fluorescence imaging is an important branch of bioimaging. It is non-invasive and provides superior spatial and temporal resolution during the real-time monitoring of biological samples of interest. Although the spatial resolution limit of optical microscopes is about 200 nm, due to the diffraction limit, with the application of super-resolution fluorescence microscopy technologies this limit has been pushed below 30 nm. This makes it feasible to visualize biological structures in subcellular levels and to monitor subcellular biological processes in real time. However, due to the complexity of the biological structure and components within cells, simultaneous staining and monitoring multiple intracellular components with different coloured fluorophores is often needed during multiplex imaging, to better understand biological processes. Aggregation-induced emission luminogens (AIEgen) and AIEgen based nanoparticles (NPs) have presented many advantages in fluorescence imaging, with strong potential for biological science and nano-medicine. Herein this review, we focus on the advantages of AIEgen and AIEgen NP in cell-based fluorescence imaging, and the latest advances of AIEgens in cell-based multiplex imaging are summarized and discussed. The future perspectives are proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available