4.1 Article

Access to mechanical thrombectomy for cerebral ischaemia: A population-based study in the North-of-France

Journal

REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE
Volume 175, Issue 9, Pages 519-527

Publisher

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.12.010

Keywords

Stroke; Cerebral ischaemia; Cerebral infarct; Stroke care; Stroke management; Thrombectomy; Thrombolysis; Population-based study

Funding

  1. Inserm (French National Institute for Health and Medical Research, Inserm UMR-S U1171)
  2. university of Lille
  3. Lille university hospital
  4. Adrinord

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose. - Hospitals admitting acute strokes should offer access to mechanical thrombectomy (MT), but local organisations are still based on facilities available before MT was proven effective. MT rates and outcomes at population levels are needed to adapt organisations. We evaluated rates of MT and outcomes in inhabitants from the North-of-France (NoF) area. Method. - We prospectively evaluated rates of MT and outcomes of patients at 3 months, good outcomes being defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0 to 2 or like the pre-stroke mRS. Results. - During the study period (2016-2017), 666 patients underwent MT (454, 68.1% associated with intravenous thrombolysis [IVT]). Besides, 1595 other patients received IVT alone. The rate of MT was 81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 72-90) per million inhabitants-year, ranging from 36 to 108 between districts. The rate of IVT was 249 (95% CI 234-264) per million inhabitants-year, ranging from 155 to 268. After 3 months, 279 (41.9%) patients who underwent MT had good outcomes, and 167 (25.1%) had died. Patients living outside the district of Lille where the only MT centre is, were less likely to have good outcomes at 3 months, after adjustment on age, sex, baseline severity, and delay. Conclusion. - The rate of MT is one of the highest reported up to now, even in low-rate districts, but outcomes were significantly worse in patients living outside the district of Lille, and this is not only explained by the delay. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available