4.6 Article

Pyroptosis is involved in cryopreservation and auto-transplantation of mouse ovarian tissues and pyroptosis inhibition improves ovarian graft function

Journal

RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages 52-56

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.02.004

Keywords

Pyroptosis; Ovarian tissue; Cryopreservation; Transplantation

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR201709270026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of pyroptosis in the cryopreservation and transplantation of mouse ovarian tissues; the effects of pyroptosis inhibitior on the ovarian graft function were also explored. ICR (institute of cancer research) mice were randomly divided into control group and experimental groups (n = 10 per group). The experimental groups included fresh graft group (autograft), cryopreserved graft group (cryopreservation + autograft), and pyroptosis inhibition group (cryopreservation + autograft + pyroptosis inhibitor). At the third day after auto-transplantation, caspase-1 and NLRP3 protein expression in grafts were assessed by Western blot; in the meantime, serum concentration of IL-1 beta was examined by ELISA. After 28 days of auto-transplantation, estradiol concentrations and follicular densities of grafts were evaluated. The caspase-1 and NLRP3 protein expression in grafts from all the experimental groups were significantly higher than that from control group respectively; moreover, there was a significant increase in serum concentrations of IL-1 beta in all experimental groups compared with control group. The concentration of estradiol and follicular densities of grafts in pyroptosis inhibition group were significantly higher than that in cryopreserved graft group. Pyroptosis is involved in cryopreservation and auto-transplantation of mouse ovarian tissues, and pyroptosis inhibition can improve the ovarian graft function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available