4.7 Article

Wave energy assessment in the China adjacent seas on the basis of a 20-year SWAN simulation with unstructured grids

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages 275-295

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.011

Keywords

Wave energy; SWAN; Unstructured grids; China Sea; Continental shelf; Wave farm location

Funding

  1. NSFC-Shandong Joint Fund Project [U1706226]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51779236]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFC0303401]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201706330064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 20 years hindcast, from 1996 to 2015, was performed to simulate the wave field in the China adjacent seas, including the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, East China Sea, as well as the northern South China Sea. Forced by CCMP V2.0 wind fields, the simulation was implemented on an unstructured SWAN model with refined spatial resolution in the continental shelf. Comparisons of significant wave height between simulations and JASON-2 altimetry measurements over the entire region and at fixed stations both show good agreement. The spatial distribution of wave energy flux was analysed on annual and monthly scales by its average values and the exploitable occurrences, the temporal variability of wave energy flux was quantified by the monthly variability index. Afterwards, taking jointly the geography restrictions on water depth and distance to shore into consideration, 12 hotspots were determined in the regions more eligible for wave energy harvesting in China. At these key locations, further sophisticated researches were conducted to investigate and compare the local wave energy and climate characteristics by means of the analysis on the storage of wave energy resource, operational, high and extreme wave conditions, the combined scatter and energy diagrams, as well as the wave energy roses. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available