4.5 Article

Modeling the effects of land cover change on sediment concentrations in a gold-mined Amazonian basin

Journal

REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 1801-1813

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-019-01513-8

Keywords

Sediment concentration; Sediment modeling; Amazon; Artisanal gold mining; Deforestation; Soil erosion

Funding

  1. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [131453/2015-7]
  2. Global Affairs Canada
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES, Brazil)
  4. Instituto Tecnologico da Vale (ITV, Brazil) [15024016001P1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Land use/land cover change (LUCC) combined with gold mining activity (GMA) have reportedly affected the water quality of Amazonian rivers by intensifying surface soil erosion and increasing rivers' sediment concentration (SC). However, the role of LUCC on river siltation in comparison to that caused by GMA has not been assessed, and predictions of SC in the rivers accounting for future LUCC are scarce. This study applied a sediment modeling approach on Crepori Basin, located at eastern Amazon Basin, to simulate the impacts of past and future LUCC on SC in the river, comparing their impacts to those caused by GMA. Between 1973 and 2012, the expansion of deforested areas in the region had increased sheet erosion-driven SC in the river, especially during the high-water season, by up to 73.3%. LUCC projections for 2050 suggest future increases in sheet erosion-driven SC during the high-water season by more than three times of that caused by the land cover scenario of 1998-2012. Comparison between SC driven by sheet erosion to that caused by GMA has also shown that during the high-water and the low-water seasons, respectively, only about 14% and 6% of the total SC in the Crepori River resulted from laminar soil erosion, with the remaining proportion resulting from GMA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available