4.4 Article

Engineering-driven performance degradation analysis of hydraulic piston pump based on the inverse Gaussian process

Journal

QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 2278-2296

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/qre.2502

Keywords

hydraulic piston pump; Inverse Gaussian (IG) process; performance degradation; reliability evaluation

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB046400]
  2. China Scholarships Council [201806020035]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51505015, 51575019, 51620105010, 51675019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As a key aircraft component, hydraulic piston pumps must be developed with high reliability. However, collecting failure time data of such pumps for reliability analysis is a big challenge. To save testing time, performance degradation data obtained from degradation tests can be used for quick reliability estimation of hydraulic piston pumps. This paper proposes an engineering-driven performance degradation analysis method considering the nature of mechanical wear of hydraulic piston pumps. First, the failure mechanism of a type of hydraulic piston pump is investigated. By taking into account the close relationship between the degradation rate and the failure mechanism, an inverse Gaussian (IG) process model with a variable rate is developed to describe the degradation behavior of the pump. Under this model, a Bayesian statistical method is developed for degradation data analysis. The corresponding procedure for model parameter estimation and reliability evaluation is also presented. The proposed degradation analysis method is illustrated using a real experimental data. The results show that the engineering-driven approach is quite effective in evaluating the lifetime of the hydraulic piston pump and will improve the overall reliability of aircraft operation in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available