4.7 Article

Origin of ecdysis: fossil evidence from 535-million-year-old scalidophoran worms

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0791

Keywords

Ecdysozoa; Scalidophora; moult; Cambrian; Kuanchuanpu Formation; South China

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB26000000]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41621003, 41772010, 41672009, 41720104002]
  3. Ministry of Science of China [D17013]
  4. 111 project of Ministry of Education of China [D17013]
  5. Most Special Fund from the State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Northwest University, China [BJ11060]
  6. Northwest University Graduate Innovation and Creativity Funds [YZZ17195]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With millions of extant species, ecdysozoans (Scalidophora, Nematoida and Panarthropoda) constitute a major portion of present-day biodiversity. All ecdysozoans secrete an exoskeletal cuticle which must be moulted periodically and replaced by a larger one. Although moulting (ecdysis) has been recognized in early Palaeozoic panarthropods such as trilobites and basal groups such as anomalocaridids and lobopodians, the fossil record lacks clear evidence of ecdysis in early scalidophorans, largely because of difficulties in recognizing true exuviae. Here, we describe two types of exuviae in microscopic scalidophoran worms from the lower most Cambrian Kuanchuanpu Formation (ca 535 Ma) of China and reconstruct their moulting process. These basal scalidophorans moulted in a manner similar to that of extant priapulid worms, extricating themselves smoothly from their old tubular cuticle or turning their exuviae inside out like the finger of a glove. This is the oldest record of moulting in ecdysozoans. We also discuss the origin of ecdysis in the light of recent molecular analyses and the significance of moulting in the early evolution of animals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available