4.8 Article

Disruption of IRE1α through its kinase domain attenuates multiple myeloma

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1906999116

Keywords

multiple myeloma; endoplasmic reticulum stress; unfolded protein response; inositol-requiring enzyme 1; kinase inhibitors

Funding

  1. Irvington Postdoctoral Fellowship of the Cancer Research Institute
  2. Howard Hughes Collaborative Innovation Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple myeloma (MM) arises from malignant immunoglobulin (Ig)-secreting plasma cells and remains an incurable, often lethal disease despite therapeutic advances. The unfolded-protein response sensor IRE1 alpha supports protein secretion by deploying a kinase-endoribonuclease module to activate the transcription factor XBP1s. MM cells may co-opt the IRE1 alpha-XBP1s pathway; however, the validity of IRE1 alpha as a potential MM therapeutic target is controversial. Genetic disruption of IRE1 alpha or XBP1s, or pharmacologic IRE1 alpha kinase inhibition, attenuated subcutaneous or orthometastatic growth of MM tumors in mice and augmented efficacy of two established frontline antimyeloma agents, bortezomib and lenalidomide. Mechanistically, IRE1 alpha perturbation inhibited expression of key components of the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation machinery, as well as secretion of Ig light chains and of cytokines and chemokines known to promote MM growth. Selective IRE1 alpha kinase inhibition reduced viability of CD138(+) plasma cells while sparing CD138(-) cells derived from bone marrows of newly diagnosed or posttreatment-relapsed MM patients, in both US-and European Union-based cohorts. Effective IRE1 alpha inhibition preserved glucose-induced insulin secretion by pancreatic microislets and viability of primary hepatocytes in vitro, as well as normal tissue homeostasis in mice. These results establish a strong rationale for developing kinase-directed inhibitors of IRE1 alpha for MM therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available