4.8 Article

Coherence and Asymmetry Cannot be Broadcast

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.020403

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union's Marie SklodowskaCurie individual Fellowships [GA794842]
  2. Spanish MINECO [SEV2015-0522, FIS2016-80773-P]
  3. Fundacio Cellex
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya (CERCA Programme) [SGR 875]
  5. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
  6. Government of Canada through the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
  7. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the presence of conservation laws, superpositions of eigenstates of the corresponding conserved quantities cannot be generated by quantum dynamics. Thus, any such coherence represents a potentially valuable resource of asymmetry, which can be used, for example, to enhance the precision of quantum metrology or to enable state transitions in quantum thermodynamics. Here we ask if such superpositions, already present in a reference system, can be broadcast to other systems, thereby distributing asymmetry indefinitely at the expense of creating correlations. We prove a no-go theorem showing that this is forbidden by quantum mechanics in every finite-dimensional system. In doing so, we also answer some open questions in the quantum information literature concerning the sharing of timing information of a clock and the possibility of catalysis in quantum thermodynamics. We also prove that even weaker forms of broadcasting, of which Aberg's catalytic coherence is a particular example, can only occur in the presence of infinite-dimensional reference systems. Our results set fundamental limits on the creation and manipulation of quantum coherence and shed light on the possibilities and limitations of quantum reference frames to act catalytically without being degraded.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available