4.5 Review

Characterizing key features in the formation of ice and gas hydrate systems

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2018.0167

Keywords

molecular simulation; nucleation; ice; gas hydrate; crystal growth; crystal defect

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41473063]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2016-03845]
  3. Ministry of Research and Innovation, CNCS - UEFISCDI [PN-III-P4-ID-PCCF-2016-0050]
  4. Wenner-Gren Foundation Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crystallization in liquids is critical to a range of important processes occurring in physics, chemistry and life sciences. In this article, we review our efforts towards understanding the crystallization mechanisms, where we focus on theoretical modelling and molecular simulations applied to ice and gas hydrate systems. We discuss the order parameters used to characterize molecular ordering processes and how different order parameters offer different perspectives of the underlying mechanisms of crystallization. With extensive simulations of water and gas hydrate systems, we have revealed unexpected defective structures and demonstrated their important roles in crystallization processes. Nucleation of gas hydrates can in most cases be characterized to take place in a two-step mechanism where the nucleation occurs via intermediate metastable precursors, which gradually reorganizes to a stable crystalline phase. We have examined the potential energy landscapes explored by systems during nucleation, and have shown that these landscapes are rugged and funnel-shaped. These insights provide a new framework for understanding nucleation phenomena that has not been addressed in classical nucleation theory. This article is part of the theme issue 'The physics and chemistry of ice: scaffolding across scales, from the viability of life to the formation of planets'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available