4.5 Article

Use of thraustochytrid Schizochytrium sp as source of lipid and fatty acid in a formulated diet for abalone Haliotis asinina (Linnaeus) juveniles

Journal

AQUACULTURE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 1103-1118

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10499-016-9974-3

Keywords

Thraustochytrid Schizochytrium sp.; Formulated diets; Lipid and fatty acids; Abalone

Categories

Funding

  1. SEAFDEC/AQD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of using thraustochytrid Schizochytrium sp. as source of lipid and fatty acids in a formulated diet on growth, survival, body composition, and salinity tolerance of juvenile donkey's ear abalone, Haliotis asinina, were investigated. Treatments consisted of diets either containing a 1:1 ratio of cod liver oil (CLO) and soybean oil (SBO) (Diet 1) or thraustochytrid (Diet 2) as source of lipid and fatty acids at 2 % level. Natural diet Gracilariopsis heteroclada (Diet 3) served as the control. No significant difference in growth was observed in abalone fed Diet 3 (SGR: 5.3 % BW day(-1); DISL: 265 mu m day(-1)) and Diet 2 (SGR: 5.2 % BW day(-1); DISL: 255 mu m day(-1)). Survival ranged from 78 to 85 % for all treatments and was not significantly different from each other. A 96-h salinity stress test showed highest survival of 84 % in abalone fed Diet 2 compared with those fed diets 1 and 3 (42 %). The high growth rate of abalone fed Diet 2 and high tolerance to low salinity could be attributed to its high DHA content (8.9 %), which resulted to its high DHA/EPA ratio of 10.5 %. These fatty acids play a significant role in abalone nutrition. The fatty acid profile of abalone meat is a reflective of the fatty acid profile of the oil sources in the diet. The present study suggests that the use of Schizochytrium oil in lieu of CLO and SBO can support good growth of abalone which is comparable with abalone fed the natural seaweeds diet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available