4.7 Article

Study on intelligent collision avoidance and recovery path planning system for the waterjet-propelled unmanned surface vehicle

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages 489-498

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.076

Keywords

Unmanned surface vehicle; Waterjet propulsion; Path planning; Apollonius circle; Automatic recovery; Reeds-Shepp curve

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018IVB084,2017-YB-030, 175111001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To avoid collision accidents and achieve independent recovery in the cluttered marine environment, this work proposes an intelligent path planning system for a waterjet-propelled unmanned surface vehicle (USV). Unlike the existing works on USV navigation systems, our study focuses on the real-time, smoothness and seaworthiness properties of the path in practical clutter environments. A hybrid A* algorithm with motion primitive constraints is proposed to generate an initial reference path. According to different types of dynamic obstacles, the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs) rules are used, and a local threat map based on the Apollonius circle is constructed to avoid these obstacles. Together with the motion characteristics of the waterjet-propelled USV, the Reeds-Shepp curve is used to calculate the autonomous recovery path. The performance of the proposed intelligent navigation system is verified in a practical marine environment. The experimental results show that our hybrid A* algorithm outperforms the conventional A* algorithm, and it is easy for the waterjet-propelled USV to follow the final continuous curvature path. It was demonstrated that our method can effectively avoid various static and dynamic obstacles in real time and thus help achieve autonomous recovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available