4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Revaluation of the aging property modification factor of lead rubber bearings based on accelerated aging tests and finite element analysis

Journal

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
Volume 347, Issue -, Pages 59-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.03.021

Keywords

Aging property modification factor; Accelerated aging test; Aging depth; Long-term behavior

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government [NRF-2017M2A8A4014827]
  2. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  3. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20181510102410]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hysteresis characteristics of lead rubber bearings (LRBs) are affected by external temperature and aged-related degradation, among other things. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) presents an aging property modification factor (lambda(aging)) according to the type of seismic isolators in order to consider the change at design stage, of the age-related degradation characteristics of LRBs. However, the aging property modification factor is affected by the diameter of a bearing and the aging time as well as the type of seismic isolators. In this study, the time dependent properties of rubber materials were defined based on the results of an accelerated aging test, and the critical aging depth of the LRBs was calculated from the aging depth test results. The hysteresis characteristic of LRBs was analysed using the finite element method. From the analysis results, it was found that post yield stiffness and effective stiffness of small LRBs was higher than that of large LRBs. Therefore, it is necessary to present the existing aging property modification factor of LRBs (including rubber bearings) according to the size of the seismic isolators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available