4.6 Article

Practical decoy-state method for twin-field quantum key distribution

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab2b00

Keywords

twin-field quantum key distribution; decoy-state method; single-photon interference; measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD); analytical bounds

Funding

  1. European Union [675662]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO), the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) [TEC2017-88243-R]
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [675662] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Twin-field (TF) quantum key distribution (QKD) represents a novel QKD approach whose principal merit is to beat the point-to-point private capacity of a lossy quantum channel, thanks to performing single-photon interference in an untrusted node. Indeed, recent security proofs of various TF-QKD type protocols have confirmed that the secret key rate of these schemes scales essentially as the square root of the transmittance of the channel. Here, we focus on the TF-QKD protocol introduced by Curty et al, whose secret key rate is nearly an order of magnitude higher than previous solutions. Its security relies on the estimation of the detection probabilities associated to various photon-number states through the decoy-state method. We derive analytical bounds on these quantities assuming that each party uses either two, three or four decoy intensity settings, and we investigate the protocol's performance in this scenario. Our simulations show that two decoy intensity settings are enough to beat the point-to-point private capacity of the channel, and that the use of four decoys is already basically optimal, in the sense that it almost reproduces the ideal scenario of infinite decoys. We also observe that the protocol seems to be quite robust against intensity fluctuations of the optical pulses prepared by the parties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available