4.7 Review

Sleep deprivation, vigilant attention, and brain function: a review

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 21-30

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41386-019-0432-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program [W81XWH-16-1-0319]
  2. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the FY17, Broad Agency Announcement for Extramural Medical Research [W81XWH-18-1-0100]
  3. Defense University Research Instrumentation Program [N00014-17-1-2990]
  4. NIH [R01HL105768]
  5. NASA [NAG91161]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vigilant attention is a major component of a wide range of cognitive performance tasks. Vigilant attention is impaired by sleep deprivation and restored after rest breaks and (more enduringly) after sleep. The temporal dynamics of vigilant attention deficits across hours and days are driven by physiologic, sleep regulatory processes-a sleep homeostatic process and a circadian process. There is also evidence of a slower, allostatic process, which modulates the sleep homeostatic setpoint across days and weeks and is responsible for cumulative deficits in vigilant attention across consecutive days of sleep restriction. There are large inter-individual differences in vulnerability to sleep loss, and these inter-individual differences constitute a pronounced human phenotype. However, this phenotype is multi-dimensional; vulnerability in terms of vigilant attention impairment can be dissociated from vulnerability in terms of other cognitive processes such as attentional control. The vigilance decrement, or time-on-task effect-a decline in performance across the duration of a vigilant attention task-is characterized by progressively increasing response variability, which is exacerbated by sleep loss. This variability, while crucial to understanding the impact of sleep deprivation on performance in safety-critical tasks, is not well explained by top-down regulatory mechanisms, such as the homeostatic and circadian processes. A bottom-up, neuronal pathway-dependent mechanism involving use-dependent, local sleep may be the main driver of response variability. This bottom-up mechanism may also explain the dissociation between cognitive processes with regard to trait vulnerability to sleep loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available