4.2 Article

A combined therapy for limb apraxia and related anosognosia

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 2016-2034

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2019.1628075

Keywords

Naturalistic Action Therapy; limb apraxia; Anosognosia for apraxia; rehabilitation; tool-use

Funding

  1. DFG [RA2492/3-1]
  2. EU FP7 Marie Curie Zukunftskolleg Incoming Fellowship Programme at the University of Konstanz [291784]
  3. Landesgraduiertenforderungsgesetz (LGFG) in Baden-Wurttemberg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Left hemisphere stroke frequently leads to limb apraxia, a disorder that has been reported to impact independence in daily life and rehabilitation success. Nonetheless, there is a shortcoming in research and availability of applicable trainings. Further, to date, anosognosia for limb apraxia has largely been neglected. Therefore, we developed a Naturalistic Action Therapy that trains object selection and application with an errorless learning approach and which includes supported self-evaluation. The current study presents the results of two stroke patients participating in the training. The procedure entailed two baseline and one post-training sessions including standardized limb apraxia and anosognosia assessments as well as 18 naturalistic action tasks. The training consisted of 15 sessions during which 4-6 of the 18 naturalistic action tasks (e.g., pour water into a glass, make a phone call) were trained. Both patients showed improvement in trained and untrained tasks as well as in standardized apraxia and anosognosia assessments. Training effects appeared strongest for the trained items. The procedure is documented in detail and easy to administer and thus may have the potential to be applied by relatives. The results of this pilot-study are promising and suggest that the approach is suitable for further evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available