4.6 Article

Nonnegative matrix tri-factorization with user similarity for clustering in point-of-interest

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 363, Issue -, Pages 58-65

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.07.040

Keywords

Point of interest (POI); Nonnegative matrix tri-factorization; Clustering; User similarity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61701190]
  2. National Key RD Plan of China [2017YFA0604500]
  3. Youth Science Foundation of Jilin Province of China [20180520021JH]
  4. Key Technology Innovation Cooperation Project of Government and University for the whole Industry Demonstration [SXGJSF2017-4]
  5. Key scientific and technological R&D Plan of Jilin Province of China [20180201103GX]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M631873]
  7. Project of Jilin Province Development and Reform Commission [2019FGWTZC001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the widespread use of Location-based Social Networks (LBSNs), massive Point-of-Interest (POI) data continuously generated by users. POI clustering is an essential foundation for efficiently processing large amounts of POI data. However, the majority of existing studies only consider artificial labels and geographic information for clustering POIs and rarely take account of the characteristics of user behavior. The main challenge of POI clustering is lack of label information at present. To address the issues above, we propose a method of collaborative clustering based on Nonnegative Matrix Tri-factorization for POI (POI-NMTF), which combines the similarity of users based on time and location by exploiting the user check-in data in our study. Our algorithm provides a co-clustering method that allows clustering users and POIs simultaneously thereby discover the potential preference of users. Moreover, it can also better reflect the multiple interest attributes of users for a single POI, because our algorithm is a soft clustering method. We test our method using real dataset, and the experimental results show the validity and correctness of our algorithm, the clustering result is superior to other compared methods. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available