4.6 Article

Densely pyramidal residual network for UAV-based railway images dehazing

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 371, Issue -, Pages 124-136

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.06.076

Keywords

Images dehazing; UAV images degradation; Railway inspection; Image recognition; Densely residual network; SSIM

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91738301]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB1200203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On purpose of aiding detection and recognition for railway infrastructure and dramatic changes in the environment around railways, visual inspection based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images is a highlight. However, UAV images often suffer from degradation for fog or haze, which limits the inspection efficiency. Most existing methods depend on a suboptimal two-step network with much more redundant procedures where transmission map and atmospheric light are estimated at first, and then haze-free images can be acquired using a dehazing model. This paper presents a novel end-to-end network for UAV-based railway images dehazing, and focuses on two key issues: network architecture and loss function. With regards to the first aspect, based on a pyramidal network structure, densely pyramidal residual network (DPRnet) consists of dense residual block and enhanced residual blocks, which heavily exploits the feature maps of all preceding layers and considerably increased depth at different scale, respectively. With regards to the second, a new loss function introducing structural similarity index is proposed to preserve more structural information, thereby restore the appealing perceptual quality of the hazy images. Finally, quantitative and qualitative evaluations illustrate that the DPRnet achieves better performance over the classic methods, yet remains efficient and convenient. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available