4.6 Review

Risk factors for childhood and adult primary brain tumors

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages 1357-1375

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz123

Keywords

epidemiology; glioma; meningioma; pediatric brain tumors; risk factors

Funding

  1. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RP160097T]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [T32 CA 009001]
  3. EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative 1 Joint Undertaking (ULTRA-DD grant) [115766]
  4. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
  5. NIH [R01CA194189]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary brain tumors account for similar to 1% of new cancer cases and similar to 2% of cancer deaths in the United States; however, they are the most commonly occurring solid tumors in children. These tumors are very heterogeneous and can be broadly classified into malignant and benign (or non-malignant), and specific histologies vary in frequency by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Epidemiological studies have explored numerous potential risk factors, and thus far the only validated associations for brain tumors are ionizing radiation (which increases risk in both adults and children) and history of allergies (which decreases risk in adults). Studies of genetic risk factors have identified 32 germline variants associated with increased risk for these tumors in adults (25 in glioma, 2 in meningioma, 3 in pituitary adenoma, and 2 in primary CNS lymphoma), and further studies are currently under way for other histologic subtypes, as well as for various childhood brain tumors. While identifying risk factors for these tumors is difficult due to their rarity, many existing datasets can be leveraged for future discoveries in multi-institutional collaborations. Many institutions are continuing to develop large clinical databases including pre-diagnostic risk factor data, and developments in molecular characterization of tumor subtypes continue to allow for investigation of more refined phenotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available