4.7 Article

The immune cell landscape in kidneys of patients with lupus nephritis

Journal

NATURE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages 902-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41590-019-0398-x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Accelerating Medicines Partnership (AMP) in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Lupus Network
  2. AbbVie Inc.
  3. Arthritis Foundation
  4. Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
  5. Lupus Foundation of America
  6. Lupus Research Alliance
  7. Merck Sharp Dohme Corp.
  8. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
  9. Pfizer Inc., Rheumatology Research Foundation
  10. Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.
  11. National Institutes of Health [UH2-AR067676, UH2-AR067677, UH2-AR067679, UH2-AR067681, UH2-AR067685, UH2-AR067688, UH2-AR067689, UH2-AR067690, UH2-AR067691, UH2-AR067694, UM2-AR067678]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lupus nephritis is a potentially fatal autoimmune disease for which the current treatment is ineffective and often toxic. To develop mechanistic hypotheses of disease, we analyzed kidney samples from patients with lupus nephritis and from healthy control subjects using single-cell RNA sequencing. Our analysis revealed 21 subsets of leukocytes active in disease, including multiple populations of myeloid cells, Tcells, natural killer cells and B cells that demonstrated both pro-inflammatory responses and inflammation-resolving responses. We found evidence of local activation of B cells correlated with an age-associated B-cell signature and evidence of progressive stages of monocyte differentiation within the kidney. A clear interferon response was observed in most cells. Two chemokine receptors, CXCR4 and CX3CR1, were broadly expressed, implying a potentially central role in cell trafficking. Gene expression of immune cells in urine and kidney was highly correlated, which would suggest that urine might serve as a surrogate for kidney biopsies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available