4.8 Article

Carbon stocks in central African forests enhanced by elephant disturbance

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages 725-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-019-0395-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CEA Enhanced Eurotalents Fellowship (a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions Programme)
  2. University of Tuscia doctoral programme
  3. Max-Planck-Society
  4. German Ministry of Education and Research
  5. le Conseil Regional de Bourgogne
  6. USAID

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large herbivores, such as elephants, can have important effects on ecosystems and biogeochemical cycles. Yet, the influence of elephants on the structure, productivity and carbon stocks in Africa's rainforests remain largely unknown. Here, we quantify those effects by incorporating elephant disturbance in the Ecosystem Demography model, and verify the modelled effects by comparing them with forest inventory data from two lowland primary forests in Africa. We find that the reduction of forest stem density due to the presence of elephants leads to changes in the competition for light, water and space among trees. These changes favour the emergence of fewer and larger trees with higher wood density. Such a shift in African's rainforest structure and species composition increases the long-term equilibrium of aboveground biomass. The shift also reduces the forest net primary productivity, given the trade-off between productivity and wood density. At a typical density of 0.5 to 1 animals per km(2), elephant disturbances increase aboveground biomass by 26-60 t ha(-1). Conversely, the extinction of forest elephants would result in a 7% decrease in the aboveground biomass in central African rainforests. These modelled results are confirmed by field inventory data. We speculate that the presence of forest elephants may have shaped the structure of Africa's rainforests, which probably plays an important role in differentiating them from Amazonian rainforests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available