4.8 Article

California forest die-off linked to multi-year deep soil drying in 2012-2015 drought

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 632-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-019-0388-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation, through the SSCZO [EAR-1331931]
  2. US Department of Agriculture [2018-67004-27405]
  3. University of California Laboratory Fees Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Widespread episodes of recent forest die-off have been tied to the occurrence of anomalously warm droughts, although the underlying mechanisms remain inadequately understood. California's 2012-2015 drought, with exceptionally low precipitation and warmth, and widespread conifer death, provides an opportunity to explore the chain of events leading to forest die-off. Here, we present the spatial and temporal patterns of die-off and moisture deficit during California's drought, based on field and remote sensing observations. We found that die-off was closely tied to multi-year deep-rooting-zone drying, and that this relationship provides a framework with which to diagnose and predict mortality. Marked tree death in an intensively studied Sierra Nevada forest followed a four-year moisture overdraft, with cumulative 2012-2015 evapotranspiration exceeding precipitation by similar to 1,500 mm, and subsurface moisture exhaustion to 5-15-m depth. Observations across the entire Sierra Nevada further linked tree death to deep drying, with die-off and moisture overdraft covarying across latitude and elevation. Unusually dense vegetation and warm temperatures accelerated southern Sierran evapotranspiration in 2012-2015, intensifying overdraft and compounding die-off by an estimated 55%. Climate change is expected to further amplify evapotranspiration and moisture overdraft during drought, potentially increasing Sierran tree death during drought by similar to 15-20% degrees C-1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available