4.8 Article

Mapping human microbiome drug metabolism by gut bacteria and their genes

Journal

NATURE
Volume 570, Issue 7762, Pages 462-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1291-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [GM118159, GM105456, AI124275, DK114793]
  2. Center for Microbiome Informatics and Therapeutics
  3. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  4. Yale Cancer Center
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation [P2EZP3_162256, P300PA_177915]
  6. European Molecular Biology Organization [ALTF 670-2016]
  7. Early Postdoc Mobility Fellowship from the Swiss National Science Foundation [P2EZP3_178482]
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P2EZP3_178482, P300PA_177915, P2EZP3_162256] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individuals vary widely in their responses to medicinal drugs, which can be dangerous and expensive owing to treatment delays and adverse effects. Although increasing evidence implicates the gut microbiome in this variability, the molecular mechanisms involved remain largely unknown. Here we show, by measuring the ability of 76 human gut bacteria from diverse clades to metabolize 271 orally administered drugs, that many drugs are chemically modified by microorganisms. We combined high-throughput genetic analyses with mass spectrometry to systematically identify microbial gene products that metabolize drugs. These microbiome-encoded enzymes can directly and substantially affect intestinal and systemic drug metabolism in mice, and can explain the drug-metabolizing activities of human gut bacteria and communities on the basis of their genomic contents. These causal links between the gene content and metabolic activities of the microbiota connect interpersonal variability in microbiomes to interpersonal differences in drug metabolism, which has implications for medical therapy and drug development across multiple disease indications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available