4.8 Article

Tailored Phase Transformation of CsPbI2Br Films by Copper(II) Bromide for High-Performance All-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages 5176-5184

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01553

Keywords

Inorganic perovskites; CsPbI2Br; phase transformation; crystallization; copper(II) bromide

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [91733301, 61674109]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0202400]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20170059]
  4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  6. 111 Project of The State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All-inorganic-based perovskites achieved by replacing the organic component with cesium (Cs) have drawn more attention because of their intrinsic inorganic stability. However, the cell efficiency in all-inorganic perovskite solar cells is still far below that in organic inorganic hybrid perovskite-based devices. Here, we develop a new strategy to mediate the CsPbI2Br crystallization by directly doping copper(II) bromide (CuBr2) into a perovskite precursor. The incorporation of CuBr2 played a role in retarding the crystallization dynamics process of CsPbI2Br film, resulting in a high-quality all-inorganic perovskite film with enlarged grain size, improved carrier mobilities, and reduced trap states. The fabricated perovskite solar cells delivered a champion power conversion efficiency of 16.15%, which is the highest efficiency in CsPbI2Br based all-inorganic perovskite solar cells and largely higher than 13.24% for pristine CsPbI2Br based device. The developed doping method paves a new route to fabricate high-performance all-inorganic perovskite solar cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available