4.5 Article

An Analysis of Skin Test Responses to Spherulin-Based Coccidioidin (Spherusol®) Among a Group of Subjects with Various Forms of Active Coccidioidomycosis

Journal

MYCOPATHOLOGIA
Volume 184, Issue 4, Pages 533-538

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11046-019-00356-5

Keywords

Cellular coccidioidomycosis; Skin testing; Delayed-type hypersensitivity immunity

Categories

Funding

  1. Nielsen Biosciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background A reformulated skin test for coccidioidomycosis, Spherusol (R), was recently approved for use in the USA. We hypothesized that it could be useful in predicting severity of illness and outcome in various types of coccidioidomycosis. Methods Subjects with non-meningeal coccidioidomycosis attending a clinic in the coccidioidal endemic region were skin tested with Spherusol (R) and clinical data were collected at the time of testing and at follow-up. Results Twenty-seven subjects were studied, eight of whom had extrathoracic dissemination. A total of 15 subjects had positive tests, including 11 of 19 subjects with non-disseminated pulmonary disease and four with extrathoracic disseminated coccidioidomycosis. Among those with non-disseminated pulmonary disease, age >= 65 years, female sex, and antifungal therapy were significantly associated with a negative test on univariate but not multivariate analysis. For 23 subjects, there was a trend for those not on antifungal therapy at the time of follow-up to have a positive test but no association with coccidioidal complement-fixation titer or overall outcome. Conclusions Not all subjects with non-disseminated pulmonary coccidioidomycosis were found to be skin test positive and half of those with extrathoracic disseminated disease manifested dermal hypersensitivity. In this small study, the results of the skin test were not clinically predictive of disease severity or outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available