4.5 Article

New Molecular Markers Distinguishing Fonsecaea Agents of Chromoblastomycosis

Journal

MYCOPATHOLOGIA
Volume 184, Issue 4, Pages 493-504

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11046-019-00359-2

Keywords

Chromoblastomycosis; Molecular detection; RCA; Padlock probe; CBF5 gene; Fonsecaea

Categories

Funding

  1. Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brasilia, Brazil
  2. Education Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel-CAPES
  3. CNPq, Brasilia, Brazil [312811/20187]
  4. CAPES (PNPD 2014-18)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The species belonging to the genus Fonsecaea are the main causative agents of chromoblastomycosis. The invasive potential of Fonsecaea differs significantly among its various sibling species. Moreover, the lack of clarity on the virulence and availability of precise markers to distinguish and detect Fonsecaea species is attributed to the different ways of dissemination and pathogenicity. Therefore, the present study aimed to propose new molecular tools to differentiate between sibling species causing chromoblastomycosis. We used an infection model of chromoblastomycosis in BALB/c to study species-specific molecular markers for the in vivo detection of Fonsecaea species in biological samples. Specific primers based on the CBF5 gene were developed for Fonsecaea pedrosoi, Fonsecaea monophora, Fonsecaea nubica, and Fonsecaea pugnacius. In addition, a padlock probe was designed for F. pugnacius based on ITS sequences. We also assessed the specificity of Fonsecaea species using in silico, in vitro, and in vivo assays. The results showed that markers and probes could effectively discriminate the species in both clinical and environmental samples, enabling bioprospecting of agents of chromoblastomycosis, thereby elucidating the infection route of the disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available