4.7 Article

Abundance matching with the mean star formation rate: there is no missing satellites problem in the Milky Way above M200 ∼ 109 M⊙

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 487, Issue 4, Pages 5799-5812

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1320

Keywords

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: haloes; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; cosmology: observations; dark matter

Funding

  1. Science Technology and Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/M000990/1]
  2. MERAC foundation
  3. National Science Foundation [NSF PHY-1748958]
  4. STFC [ST/M000990/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce a novel abundance matching technique that produces a more accurate estimate of the pre-infall halo mass, M-200, for satellite galaxies. To achieve this, we abundance match with the mean star formation rate, averaged over the time when a galaxy was forming stars, SFR, instead of the stellar mass, M. Using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, the GAMA survey and the Bolshoi simulation, we obtain a statistical SFR-M-200 relation in Lambda cold dark matter. We then compare the pre-infall halo mass, , derived from this relation with the pre-infall dynamical mass, , for 21 nearby dSph and dIrr galaxies, finding a good agreement between the two. As a first application, we use our new SFR-M-200 relation to empirically measure the cumulative mass function of a volume-complete sample of bright Milky Way satellites within 280kpc of the Galactic centre. Comparing this with a suite of cosmological zoom' simulations of Milky Way-mass haloes that account for subhalo depletion by the Milky Way disc, we find no missing satellites problem above M-200 similar to 10(9)M(circle dot) in the Milky Way. We discuss how this empirical method can be applied to a larger sample of nearby spiral galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available