4.7 Article

Survivability of radio-loud planetary cores orbiting white dwarfs

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 488, Issue 1, Pages 153-163

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1721

Keywords

celestial mechanics; planets and satellites: detection; planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability; planet-star interactions; white dwarfs; radio lines: planetary systems

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation through the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics programme 'Better Stars, Better Planets' [NSF PHY-1748958]
  2. STFC via an Ernest Rutherford Fellowship [ST/P003850/1]
  3. University of Warwick
  4. Pennsylvania State University
  5. Eberly College of Science
  6. STFC [ST/P003850/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The discovery of the intact metallic planetary core fragment orbiting the white dwarf SDSS J1228+1040 within one Solar radius highlights the possibility of detecting larger, unfragmented conducting cores around magnetic white dwarfs through radio emission. Previous models of this decades-old idea focused on determining survivability of the cores based on their inward Lorentz drift towards the star. However, gravitational tides may represent an equal or dominant force. Here, we couple both effects by assuming a Maxwell rheological model and performing simulations over the entire range of observable white dwarf magnetic field strengths ( 10(3)-10(9) G) and their potential atmospheric electrical conductivities ( 10(-1)-10(4) S m(-1)) in order to more accurately constrain survivability lifetimes. This force coupling allows us to better pinpoint the physical and orbital parameters which allow planetary cores to survive for over a Gyr, maximizing the possibility that they can be detected. The most robust survivors showcase high dynamic viscosities ( greater than or similar to 10(24) Pa s) and orbit within kG-level magnetic fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available