4.7 Review

Tea Consumption and Health Outcomes: Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies in Humans

Journal

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
Volume 63, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201900389

Keywords

health; meta-analysis; tea consumption; umbrella review

Funding

  1. Chinese Medical Board Grant on Evidence-Based Medicine, New York, USA [98-680]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30901427]
  3. Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Support Project [2016SZ0047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scope The aim of this article is to conduct an umbrella review to study the strength and validity of associations between tea consumption and diverse health outcomes. Methods and results Meta-analyses of observational studies examining associations between tea consumption and health outcomes in all human populations and settings are screened. The umbrella review identifies 96 meta-analyses with 40 unique health outcomes. Tea consumption shows greater benefits than harm to health in this review. Dose-response analyses of tea consumption indicates reduced risks of total mortality, cardiac death, coronary artery disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with increment of two to three cups per day. Beneficial associations are also found for several cancers, skeletal, cognitive, and maternal outcomes. Harmful associations are found for esophageal and gastric cancer when the temperature of intake is more than 55-60 degrees C. Conclusion Tea consumption, except for very hot tea, seems generally safe at usual levels of intake, with summary estimates indicating the largest reduction for diverse health outcomes at two to three cups per day. Generally, tea consumption seems more beneficial than harmful in this umbrella review. Randomized controlled trials are further needed to understand whether the observed associations are causal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available