4.6 Review

Lifestyle and dietary environmental factors in colorectal cancer susceptibility

Journal

MOLECULAR ASPECTS OF MEDICINE
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 2-9

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2019.06.005

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; Environment; Diet; Lifestyle; Obesity; Etiology; Mechanisms; Genetic interactions

Funding

  1. Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (AGAUR) of the Catalan Government [2017SGR723]
  2. FEDER funds [PI14-00613, PI17-00092]
  3. Spanish Association Against Cancer (AECC) Scientific Foundation [GCTRA18022MORE]
  4. National Science Foundation [18-09709S]
  5. Ministry of Health, Czech Republic [15-27580A, NV18/03/00199]
  6. Health Research Board of Ireland [HRB-ILP-021]
  7. Instituto de Salud Carlos III

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence changes with time and by variations in diet and lifestyle, as evidenced historically by migrant studies and recently by extensive epidemiologic evidence. The worldwide heterogeneity in CRC incidence is strongly suggestive of etiological involvement of environmental exposures, particularly lifestyle and diet. It is established that physical inactivity, obesity and some dietary factors (red/processed meats, alcohol) are positively associated with CRC, while healthy lifestyle habits show inverse associations. Mechanistic evidence shows that lifestyle and dietary components that contribute to energy excess are linked with increased CRC via metabolic dysfunction, inflammation, oxidative stress, bacterial dysbiosis and breakdown of gut barrier integrity while the reverse is apparent for components associated with decreased risk. This chapter will review the available evidence on lifestyle and dietary factors in CRC etiology and their underlying mechanisms in CRC development. This short review will also touch upon available information on potential gene-environment interactions, molecular sub-types of CRC and anatomical sub-sites within the colorectum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available