4.7 Article

Surface modification of smithsonite with ammonia to enhance the formation of sulfidization products and its response to flotation

Journal

MINERALS ENGINEERING
Volume 137, Issue -, Pages 1-9

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2019.03.021

Keywords

Smithsonite flotation; Ammonia; Surface modification; Adsorption of sulfide species; Enhanced sulfidization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51804144]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018T111000]
  3. Yunnan Applied Basic Research Projects [2018FD035, 2016FD121]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposed a promising method of improving the sulfidization flotation of smithsonite through surface modification with ammonia. The floatability of ammonia-modified smithsonite was superior to that of bare smithsonite under the same flotation condition due to the enhanced sulfidization. Results of zeta potential and surface adsorption experiments showed that the preliminary modification of smithsonite surfaces with ammonia increased the amount of sulfide ion species adsorbed onto the mineral surface, thereby facilitating the attachment of xanthate species onto the sulfidized mineral surface and promoting its hydrophobicity. XPS measurement revealed that surface modification with ammonia prior to Na2S addition increased the amounts of zinc sulfide species formed on the mineral surface and altered the chemical environment of sulfidization products. Furthermore, the activation mechanism of ammonia modification for enhancing the adsorption of sulfide species onto the smithsonite surface was studied by solution chemistry calculations. Zinc ammonia complexes were found to interact with hydrophilic species coated on the smithsonite surface. This interaction increased the number of zinc sites on the surface of ammonia-modified smithsonite and thus enhanced its sulfidization flotation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available