4.7 Article

An energy intensity optimization model for production system in iron and steel industry

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 100, Issue -, Pages 285-295

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.01.064

Keywords

Iron and steel industry; Energy intensity; Ferrite-flows; Optimization model

Funding

  1. National Key Technology R&D Program during the 12th Five-Year Plan Period [2012BAF10B05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To optimize iron and steel production for the goal of energy intensity reduction, this paper systematically analyzed the flow characteristics of ferrite-flows and established an energy intensity production optimization model for production system in iron and steel industry. Production optimization model was calculated for a certain iron and steel company under five different ferrite-flows characters and structures. The results indicated that with the same product order, the energy intensity of the five optimized production schemes are decreased from the original scheme by 0.6%, 1.6%, 1.2%, 0.7% and 2.9%; calculated according to the crude steel production of the company in a month (October 2012, 1128 Kilo metric tons), energy saving of 4399 tce (ton coal equivalent), 111,505 tce, 8798 tce, 4963 tce and 20,980 tce, respectively, can be achieved. Through comparative analysis of the productions of various units under different schemes, it is discovered that the production optimization of the Ironmaking stage is the key and that the energy saving margin in optimized production of Steel-Rolling stage is limited. And then the energy saving technologies and measures, which favors production route re-optimizes, should be adopted in actual production process. In addition, the energy intensity reduces by 1.2 kgce/t, 0.4 kgce/t and 0.05 kgce/t while 1% increases of sinter ore grade, scrap and lump ore usage, respectively. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available