4.5 Article

Investigation of candidate genes of non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate, using both case-control and family-based association studies

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 98, Issue 26, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016170

Keywords

candidate gene; Family-Based Association Test; NSCL/P; single nucleotide polymorphisms

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [81273103]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81461138036]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Non-syndromic cleft of the lip and/or palate (NSCL/P) is one of the most common polygenic diseases. In this study, both case-control and family-based association study were used to confirm whether the Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) were associated with NSCL/P. Methods: A total of 37 nuclear families and 189 controls were recruited, whose blood DNA was extracted and subjected to genotyping of SNPs of 27 candidate genes by polymerase chain reaction-improved multiple ligase detection reaction technology (PCR-iMLDR). Case-control statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 19.0. Haplotype Relative Risk (HRR), transmission disequilibrium test (TDT), and Family-Based Association Test (FBAT) were used to test for over-transmission of the target alleles in case-parent trios. The gene-gene interactions on NSCL/P were analyzed by Unphased-3.1.4. Results: In case-control statistical analysis, only C14orf49 chr14_95932477 had statistically significant on genotype model (P=.03) and allele model (P=.03). Seven SNPs had statistically significant on TDT. None of 26 alleles has association with NSCL/P on FBAT. Some SNPs had haplotype-haplotype interactions and genotype-genotype interactions. Conclusion: C14orf49 chr14_95932477 was significantly different between cases and controls on genotype model and allele model by case-control design. Seven SNPs were significantly different on HRR. Four SNPs were significantly different on TDT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available