Journal
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
Volume 110, Issue -, Pages 650-675Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.07.032
Keywords
REE patterns; U-Pb geochronology; Zircon chemistry; Zircon provenance; Chiapas massive complex; Beach sediments
Categories
Funding
- Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnologia (PCML) postgraduate program
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Technologia (CONACyT) [595593/308610]
- CONACyT [A1-S-21287]
- Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigacion e Innovation Tecnologica [PAP11T, IN106117, 616]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this study, we analyzed the mineralogy and bulk chemical composition of 20 sediment samples, as well as trace, rare earth element (REE) concentrations and U-Pb ages of 400 detrital zircons retrieved from the Bosque (PB) and Paseo del Mar (PM) coastal sediments, southwestern Gulf of Mexico, to investigate the provenance. The XRD study revealed that the PB sediments are associated with quartz, muscovite, cordierite, albite, and anorthite. The PM sediments are associated with calcite, aragonite, and biogenic materials, which derived probably within the coastal environment. The weathering indices like Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA), Chemical Index of Weathering (CIW), and Plagioclase Index of Alteration (PIA) revealed a moderate intensity of weathering for the PB sediments. The chondrite normalized REE patterns of the PB and PM sediments are with negative and positive europium anomalies (Eu/Eu*), suggesting that the sediments were derived by the combination of felsic and mafic source rocks. The Th/U ratios ( > 0.3) of the PB and PM zircons indicated an igneous origin. The chondrite normalized REE patterns of the PB and PM zircons are depleted in low REE (LREE) and enriched in heavy REE (HREE) with positive cerium and negative europium anomalies. A wide variation in chondrite normalized REE patterns of zircons with respect to ages was observed. The PB is dominated by Proterozoic (similar to 551-2500 Ma) and Paleozoic zircons (similar to 445-480 Ma; Ordovician), whereas PM is dominated by Cenozoic zircons (similar to 5-21 Ma; Miocene), indicating that the zircons were derived from different source terranes. The Chiapas Massif (CMC) and Chuacus complexes are identified as the potential source areas, which contributed Proterozoic zircons to PB. On the other hand, Cuicateco terrane (CUD and Tuxtla Volcanic Field (TVF) are considered as the potential sour& areas, which supplied significant number of Cenozoic zircons to the PM coastal area. The zircon U-Pb ages and the bulk sediment geochemistry together indicate that the source terranes, which supplied sediments to the PB and PM coastal areas, consist of mafic and felsic rocks. The results of this study further illustrated the importance of littoral currents in distributing sediments, although rivers are considered as a carrier and agent of distributing sediments along the coastal areas.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available