4.7 Article

Synthesis of Co3O4/NiO nanofilms and their enhanced electrochemical performance for supercapacitor application

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 370, Issue -, Pages 528-535

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.02.193

Keywords

Co3O4/NiO nanofilms; Calcination; Electrochemical; Supercapacitor

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21471001, 21275006]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1508085MB22]
  3. Key Laboratory of Functional Inorganic Materials Chemistry of Anhui Province
  4. 211 Project of Anhui University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transition metallic oxides have attracted considerable attention for supercapacitor applications because of their superior electrochemical performance at relatively low cost. Co3O4/NiO nanofilms were successfully prepared by calcination of precursor alpha-Co(OH)(2)/alpha-Ni(OH)(2). XRD, XPS, SEM and TEM techniques were used to characterize the composition and morphology of as-prepared samples. The results demonstrated that Co3O4/NiO nanofilms presented graphene-like morphology with shrinkage and wrinkles. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) measurement showed that specific surface area of Co3O4/NiO was 176.5 m(2)/g. Electrochemical properties tests indicated that the Co3O4/NiO nanofilms had a higher specific capacitance and better rate capability than that of precursor alpha-Co(OH)(2)/alpha-Ni(OH)(2) at high current density. As to the cycling performance, the specific capacitance of Co3O4/NiO electrode would first increase from 556 F/g to 710 Fig quickly at 2 A/g after 80 cycles and then remained stable. Therefore, compared with that of precursor alpha-Co(OH)(2)/alpha-Ni(OH)(2), the capacitance performance of as-prepared Co3O4/NiO nanofilms was improved after calcination. The possible reason for the enhancement of capacitance performance was discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available