4.7 Article

Rapid detection of Yersinia enterocolitica using a single-walled carbon nanotube-based biosensor for Kimchi product

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 108, Issue -, Pages 48-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.03.037

Keywords

Single-walled carbon nanotube; Biosensor; Yersinia enterocolitica; Kimchi; Rapid detection

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2014R1A1A2055619]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014R1A1A2055619] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this research was to develop a rapid single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT)-based biosensor method and to employ it to a Kimchi product for Yersinia enterocolitica detection. A SWCNT-based biosensor was fabricated with SWCNTs immobilized with anti-Yersinia antibody (pAbs) through hybridization of 1-pyrenebutanoic acid succinimidyl ester (PBASE) as a linker. The resistance difference (AR) was calculated via linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) using a potentiostat. The specific binding of pAbs to Y. enterocolitica was confirmed by indirect ELISA. The bacteria isolated from baek Kimchi products were identified using 16S rDNA sequencing. The AR for Y. enterocolitica was significantly increased by the fabricated SWCNT-based biosensor (p < 0.05). The indirect ELISA confirmed that the biosensor immobilized with pAbs was specific enough to detect Y. enterocolitica among the tested gram-negative bacteria. The optimim concentration range for the SWCNT-based biosensor was 10(6) to 10(4) CFU/mL, and the limit of detection (LOD) of the SWCNT-based biosensor was determined to be 10(4) CFU/mL of Y. enterocolitica in both phosphate buffer solution (PBS) and Kimchi product.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available