4.3 Review

Immunotherapeutic options for management of relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: how to select newly approved agents?

Journal

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 7-17

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1641802

Keywords

Relapsed; refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia; inotuzumab ozogamicin; blinatumomab; tisagenlecleucel; immunotherapy

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences - Great Plains IDeA-CTR Network [1 U54 GM115458]
  2. Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute [P30 CA036727]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, immunotherapeutic agents such as inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), blinatumomab (BLIN), and tisagenlecleucel (TISA) have been approved for treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). No head to head trials have compared these agents. Thus, various factors influence the decision to choose an appropriate treatment for R/R ALL. INO may be preferred in patients with high tumor burden; BLIN is preferred in patients with low tumor burden or to eradicate minimal residual disease (MRD). Both INO and BLIN, compared to standard chemotherapy, increase the probability of receiving subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). TISA, approved for patients <= 25 years of age, is effective regardless of tumor burden or prior receipt of HSCT and can be used as a definite treatment in some patients. Further studies comparing the efficacy, safety, and other outcomes related to different immunotherapeutic options in combination with other treatment modalities and among themselves are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available