4.7 Article

Numerical modeling of interactions between a flow slide and buildings considering the destruction process

Journal

LANDSLIDES
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages 1903-1919

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-019-01220-9

Keywords

Flow slide; Fluid-structure interaction; SPH-FEM; Landslide; Numerical simulation

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0804602]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41725012, 41602288]
  3. Shanghai Chenguang Scheme
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flow slide is a flow-type landslide, which has high mobility and is destructive to the downstream infrastructures and buildings. In this study, a numerical method is presented to simulate the runout process of flow slide, and the interactions between flow slide and buildings on three-dimensional terrain considering the destruction process. In this proposed method, the flow slide is simulated by smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) and the buildings are simulated by the finite element method (FEM). A node-to-surface contact algorithm is adopted to transfer displacements and contact forces between the flow slide and the buildings. An element erosion algorithm is adopted to simulate the destruction process. The method is validated using an analytical solution to dam break problem and the experimental results in two flume tests. A catastrophic flow slide involving building destruction is then simulated to further test the model performance. The flow depth, flow velocity, deposition area, and building damage degree are all reasonably simulated. The typical destruction process of buildings and patterns of the flow slide are also identified. The method will contribute to a better understanding of flow-structure interactions and is a promising tool for hazard analysis and mitigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available