4.7 Article

Centrifuge modelling of submarine landslides due to static liquefaction

Journal

LANDSLIDES
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages 1921-1938

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-019-01200-z

Keywords

Submarine landslides; Static liquefaction; Centrifuge modelling; Offshore foundations

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sand erosion and scouring caused by waves and marine currents result in gradual increase of local seabed inclination and formation of slopes around hydraulic structures and offshore foundations. During this process, shear stresses in the soil body increase monotonically which may lead to static liquefaction and damage of the adjacent offshore infrastructure. This paper presents the details of a newly developed static liquefaction triggering actuator to be used at an enhanced gravity condition in a geotechnical centrifuge. This actuator simulates the steeping process of submarine sand layers due to scouring and enables the investigation of failure mechanisms in submerged slopes. The details of the centrifuge test set-up designed and constructed to simulate the process of triggering static liquefaction in loose sand layers are presented. Furthermore, the performance of the novel integrated model preparation facility using sand fluidization is explained. The set-up was used to conduct several centrifuge tests at four different slope steepening rates to investigate the slope steepening rate effects. Moreover, the effect of viscosity of the submerging pore fluid on the behaviour of the slopes at the onset of failure is investigated. The Coriolis effect on loose saturated sand samples during increase of g-level is examined as well. Results show that the built-up of pore pressure due to local shear deformations can be detected and considered as one of the triggering mechanisms of this kind of submarine slope instabilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available