4.7 Article

An efficient methodology for multi-objective optimization of water alternating CO2 EOR process

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2019.03.016

Keywords

Water alternating CO2 process; Enhanced oil recovery (EOR); MLP; Multi-objective optimization; NSGA-II; Pareto front

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water Alternating CO2 injection (WAG CO2) is one of the most promising EOR techniques for further recovery improvement. A successful implementation of this method depends mainly on its optimal design parameters, which are determined using a significant number of routinely numerical simulations. However, these latter are very time-consuming and their analysis can put a considerable strain on the flexibility of application. The aim of this study is to develop a new method to optimize WAG processes in presence of multiple conflicting criteria and time-depending constraints. To this end, a hybrid model based on multilayer perceptron (MLP), which was used as a replica of the simulator in mimicking the outputs, and Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm version II (NSGA-II) was applied. Three different MLP models were built by implementing LMA, BR and SCG algorithms during the MLP training phase. The results showed that MLP-LMA model is the most accurate proxy. In addition, the proposed MLP-LMA emulates the outputs in real-time (dynamic proxy) with a high accuracy and a tiny running-time. The hybridization NSGA II-proxy ensures the approximation of the Pareto front to the formulated WAG problem. The generated Pareto front provided many WAG scenarios yielding to practical decision-making capabilities. The findings of this review can help for better understanding and studying multi-objective based WAG optimization problems in presence of time-depending constraints. (C) 2019 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available