4.7 Article

Effects of surface passivation on α-Si3N4 nanobelts: A first-principles study

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 377, Issue -, Pages 292-300

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.179

Keywords

alpha-Si3N4 nanobelt; Surface passivation; Structural stability; Electronic properties; First-principles

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51172050, 51102060, 51102063]
  2. National Basic Research Programme of China [2011CB606400-G]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong, China [ZR2014EMM013, ZR2014EMQ009]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT.NSRIF.2016088, HIT.KITP.2014030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The energetic stability and electronic structures of H, OH, F, or Cl passivated alpha-Si3N4 nanobelts orientating along various directions are systematically investigated via first-principles calculations. The results show that the stability of nanobelts is more sensitive to the surface passivation than growth direction. It decreases in the order of (100% OH), (50% H, 50% OH), (50% H, 50% F), (100% F), (50% H, 50% Cl), (100% Cl), (100% H), and unpassivation. H atoms prefer to bond with surface N atoms of nanobelts, while OH, F and Cl prefer to bond with Si atoms of nanobelts. In addition, the surface passivation greatly changes the electronic structures of nanobelts. The OH and F passivations result in the larger band gaps than the Cl passivation. While the coverage of OH, F or Cl increases to 100%, their band gaps decrease significantly, indicating an improvement of electrical properties, which is good agreement with the experimental findings. The 100% Cl-passivated nanobelt orientating along the [011] direction possesses the smallest band gap of 1.038 eV. The band gaps are found to be affected by a competition between quantum confinement effect and the role of the surface passivated groups or atoms at the band-gap edges. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available