4.7 Article

Rapid synthesis of inherently robust and stable superhydrophobic carbon soot coatings

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 369, Issue -, Pages 341-347

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.02.089

Keywords

Superhydrophobicity; Carbon soot; Rapeseed oil; Cone-shaped chimney

Funding

  1. VCU Massey Cancer Center
  2. NIH-NCI [P30CA016059]
  3. Virginia Commonwealth University [137422]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fabrication of superhydrophobic coatings using a candle flame or rapeseed oil has become very attractive as a novel approach for synthesis of water repellent surfaces. Here, we report an improved, simplified and time-efficient method for the preparation of robust superhydrophobic carbon soot that does not require any additional stabilizers or chemical treatment. The soot's inherent stabilization is achieved using a specially-designed cone-shaped aluminum chimney, mounted over an ignited paper based wick immersed in a rapeseed oil. Such configuration decreases the level of oxygen during the process of combustion; altering the ratio of chemical bonds in the soot. As a result, the fractal-like network of the carbon nanoparticles is converted into dense and fused carbon chains, rigidly coupled to the substrate surface. The modified carbon coating shows thermal sustainability and retains superhydrophobicity up to similar to 300 degrees C. Furthermore, it demonstrates a low contact angle hysteresis of 0.7-1.2 degrees accompanied by enhanced surface adhesion and mechanical durability under random water flows. In addition, the soot's deposition rate of similar to 1.5 mu m/s reduces the exposure time of the substrate to heat and consequently minimizes the thermal effects, allowing the creation of superhydrophobic coatings on materials with low thermal stability (e.g. wood or polyethylene). (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available