4.5 Article

Design of Virus-Mimicking Polyelectrolyte Complexes for Enhanced Oral Insulin Delivery

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages 3408-3415

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2019.05.034

Keywords

biomimetic(s); chitosan; insulin; intestinal absorption; macromolecular drug delivery; oral drug delivery

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31870987]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The viscous and elastic mucus layer is still an undesirable barrier for oral insulin delivery. To solve the problem, virus-mimicking nanosized polyelectrolyte complex (PEC) was designed and their capacity in enhancing peroral insulin absorption in combination with bifunctional material sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) coating was investigated. Inspired by nature, virus-mimicking chitosan (CS)-modified L-Phe derivatives were synthesized to simulate the components of viral envelopes and then PECs between CS-g-N-Phe copolymers and insulin were prepared to achieve both structure and composition simulation of virus envelope. Based on the results from both in vitro and in vivo studies, it was concluded that in vitro mucodiffusion and in vivo hypoglycemic effect were dependent on L-Phe graft ratio, with CS-g-N-Phe(20.2%)/insulin PECs presenting 2.0- to 2.2-fold higher relative pharmacological bioavailability than nonmodified CS/insulin PECs. Thereafter, SDS solution was applied as outer layer coating on the surface of virus-mimicking PECs. The coated PECs showed improved enzymatic stability, enhanced transport across mucus layer as well as intestinal epithelium in an SDS concentration-dependent manner, with 0.6% SDS coating presenting the best effect, with further enhanced relative pharmacological bioavailability in healthy rats and prolonged therapeutic effect up to 9 h. (c) 2019 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available