Journal
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages 690-695Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.05.015
Keywords
Auditing and feedback; hospice; pharmacy and therapeutics; expenditures
Funding
- NCATS NIH HHS [KL2 TR001870] Funding Source: Medline
- NIA NIH HHS [L30 AG060590] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background. Clinicians play an important role in containing pharmaceutical spending at the patient level, as well as ensuring efficacy and quality outcomes, yet little research has examined how to achieve this goal. Measures. Using auditing and feedback (A&F) as part of a Pharmacy and Therapeutics (P&T) Committee, we evaluated our community-based hospice program's prescribing habits for opioids, antipsychotics, and antidepressants and calculated oral pharmaceutical prescription costs per-patient-day. Quality of care was reflected by patient pain scores in electronic medical records. Intervention. Our P&T Committee adopted an A&F approach to monitor and assess provider prescribing habits and cost. An already-existing pain quality improvement program assessed care quality. Outcomes. Pain relief either improved or was maintained while medication costs were reduced by over $1.00 per-patientday from 2010 to 2011. Conclusions/Lessons Learned. An active, hospice P&T Committee featuring A&F can significantly affect medication costs for a hospice program while maintaining or improving patient outcomes. (C) American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available