4.7 Article

Enhancing the mechanical and anticorrosion properties of 316L stainless steel via a cathodic plasma electrolytic nitriding treatment with added PEG

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 11, Pages 2630-2637

Publisher

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.031

Keywords

316L stainless steel; Cathodic plasma electrolytic nitriding; Coefficient of friction; Polarization curves

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771027]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-BD-18-019A]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0702100]
  4. National Environmental Corrosion Platform

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A cathodic plasma electrolytic nitriding (CPEN) treatment with a urea aqueous solution was performed on 316L stainless steel to rapidly improve its surface properties in this work. Test results show that the PEG2000 macromolecules increased the nitriding energy via enhancing the ability to bond the produced gas film to the metal/electrolyte interface. The cross-sectional morphologies indicate that a thick nitrided layer was obtained when the urea concentration was 543 g l(-1), corresponding to a Vickers hardness 450 HV0.1, which was 3.5 times larger than that of the substrate. The nitrided layer mainly contained expanded austenite (gamma(N)), oxides and iron nitrides (e.g., Fe3O4 and FeN0.076). In terms of its performance, coefficient of friction (COF) of the nitride layer decreased to nearly two-thirds that of the untreated layer, and the passivation current densities of the nitrided sample in a 3.5% NaCl solution decreased by an order of magnitude compared to that of the substrate. Therefore, the approach presented herein provides an attractive way to modify the effect of CPEN in a urea aqueous solution. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available