4.6 Article

Enhanced machinability of SiC-reinforced metal-matrix composite with hybrid turning

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 268, Issue -, Pages 149-161

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.01.017

Keywords

Machinability; Particle-reinforced metal-matrix composites; Chip formation; Surface topography; Tool wear; Hybrid machining

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013C8035805]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK) [EP/P027555/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/P027555/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Particle-reinforced metal-matrix composites are promising engineering materials thanks to their superior mechanical and thermal properties. However, their poor machinability is a deterrent for use in wider applications, due to the presence of hard ceramic particles, which results in rapid tool wear during machining. Ultrasonically assisted turning (UAT) is a hybrid machining technique, in which the cutting tool is made to vibrate at high frequencies and low amplitudes. In this study, the machinability and tool wear of machining SiCp/Al metal matrix-composite was compared for thy UAT and conventional turning with the use of a cemented carbide (WC) and a polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tool. With the use of ultrasonic assistance, a significant reduction in cutting forces was achieved with a slight increase in cutting temperature. Continuous and semi-continuous chips were obtained in UAT, with better surface topography. A chip-formation mechanism in UAT show increased ductility of the workpiece material when subjected to a repeated high-frequency microchipping process. Abrasive and adhesive wear occurred on the WC tool in both conventional turning and UAT. However, the machined surface obtained in UAT with a WC tool was comparable and sometimes even better than that achieved with the PCD tool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available