4.7 Article

Rough-probabilistic clustering and hidden Markov random field model for segmentation of HEp-2 cell and brain MR images

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 558-576

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.03.010

Keywords

Segmentation; Rough clustering; Stomped normal distribution; Expectation maximization; Hidden Markov random field

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi [SB/S3/EECE/050/2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The segmentation of images into different meaningful classes is an important task for automatic image analysis technique. The finite Gaussian mixture model is one of the popular models for parametric model based image segmentation. However, the normality assumption of this model induces certain limitations as a single representative value is considered to represent each class. In this regard, the paper presents a new clustering algorithm, termed as rough-probabilistic clustering, integrating judiciously the merits of rough sets and a new probability distribution, called stomped normal (SN) distribution. The intensity distribution of a class is represented by SN distribution, where each class consists of a crisp lower approximation and a probabilistic boundary region. The intensity distribution of any image is modeled as a mixture of finite number of SN distributions. The expectation-maximization algorithm is used to estimate the parameters of each class. Incorporating hidden Markov random field framework into rough probabilistic clustering, a new method is proposed for accurate and robust segmentation of images. The performance of the proposed segmentation approach, along with a comparison with related methods, is demonstrated on a set of HEp-2 cell images, and synthetic and real brain MR images for different bias fields and noise levels. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available